Egyptian Dermatology Online Journal, Volume 1 Number 2
EDOJ



Contents








The efficacy of 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel base for treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS): A double blind study.


Iraji Fariba MD*, Ghafgasi Taghi PhD**., Eslami Samani Mazdak MD*, Tashakori Maryam MD*, Siadat Amir HosseinMD***, Enshaieh Shahla MD*, Shahmoradi Zabiholah MD*.

Egyptian Dermatology Online Journal 1 (2): 4


Departments Dermatology*, and Pharmacology **, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. ang Skin diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan, Iran***

 amirhossein1@yahoo.com


Submitted: August 24, 2005.
Accepted: October 26, 2005 .
Published December, 2005.

Click Here for a Printable PDF version  





Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of 3% Diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan base versus 2.5% gel base alone on the pain duration and healing time of the minor aphthous ulcers.
Materials and Methods: 44 patients with minor RAS were selected randomly and treated with 3% Diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan or the 2.5% hyaluronan base alone. Pain duration and healing duration of the lesions were evaluated.
The collected data were analyzed statistically by SPSS 10 program and Student's t-test.
Results: The mean of time for lesions to become pain free was 5.51.5 days and 4.091.3 days, for controls and cases patients respectively and this difference was significant (P value = 0.002) The mean of healing time for lesions in the controls and cases group were 8.18 0.9 days and 8 1.19, respectively, and this difference was not significant statistically (P-value=0.57).
Conclusion: diclofenac gel is effective in reducing pain duration of the minor RAS although it is not effective in healing of them.



Introduction

Recurrent Aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a chronic condition, usually with a childhood or adolescent onset and with a tendency to diminish in frequency and severity with age. Most patients are otherwise healthy .RAS affects 5-25% of the general population [1]. It is most commonly found in women [2], but there are studies that report a prevalence of more than 50% in men [3], with a significantly greater involvement among high socioeconomic groups[4] .
Typical RAS lesions involve self-limited, painful, clearly defined shallow round or oval 1 3 mm ulcers, each with a shallow necrotic center. These ulcers are covered with a yellow-grayish pseudomembrane and are surrounded by minimal raised margins and an erythematous halo representing superficial vasculitis and foci of extravasated erythrocytes located in the superficial layers of the lamina propria[1].
Minor aphthae, also known as Mikulicz's aphthae, named for Johann von Mikulicz-Radecki, who was probably the first to describe it in late 19th century (1898), or mild aphthous ulcer, accounts for 75 85% of all aphthous lesions [5]. These ulcers are not larger than 8 10 mm and tend to heal within 10 14 days (average 12 days) without scarring. Minor aphthae can involve every nonkeratinized mucosa of the oral cavity and is usually observed in the labial mucosa, buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth, and on the ventral or border of the tongue. The labial mucosa is the most prevalent area [6]
The precise cause of RAS remains unclear [7] but it has been associated with a deficit of folic acid, iron, zinc, vitamin B1, B2, B6 or B12; Behcet's syndrome, gastrointestinal disorders (Crohn's disease, celiac diseases ulcerative rectocolitis); Immunodeficiencies (HIV and others); stress, trauma, cessation of smoking, luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and oral healthcare products containing sodium lauryl sulfate [8-12].
Several treatment options have been suggested for treatment of the RAS. One study has suggested the use of 3% Diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan as the treatment modality for RAS [13]. In this study, we evaluated the effects of this treatment on the pain duration and healing time of the minor aphthous ulcers.



Patients and methods


This study was a double – blind clinical trial and was performed in skin diseases and leishmaniasis research center. 44 patients with minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis were selected randomly.
The patients had no Predisposing diseases and all of the patients had signed the informed consent form. All of the patients had at least 1 attack of aphthous ulceration in the recent 6 months and their diseases had enough severity to interfere with their normal activities such as nutrition, sleep and etc.
Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or breast feeding, allergy to diclofenac, age lass then 7 years old, predisposing systemic disease (such as renal failure, sweet syndrome, Behcet's syndrome, anemia, immune deficiency, inflammatory bowel diseases and etc), and careless patients.
After history taking and complete physical examinations, relevant laboratory examinations were done to rule out predisposing disease.
After confirmation of the presence of the minor RAS without predisposing diseases, enough information and instruction was given to patients and informed consent was taken from them and patients asked to fill out the relevant questionnaires.
These 44 patients were randomly allocated in 2 placebo and control groups. The control patients were treated with 2% hyaluronan gel (as placebo) and case patients were treated with 3% diclofenac in 2% hyaluronan gel .They were blind to the type of treatment. The patients applied the drug on their lesions twice daily and did not drink or eat for at least 10 minutes after gel application.
The patients were visited and assessed in a blind fashion at days 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 after base time for pain severity and lesion healing. Any side effects were recorded.
Improvement criteria were defined as: 1-duration of pain be less that 4 days; 2- time of complete healing (returnee of oral mucosa to normal condition without any red or white spot) be less than 8 days. We considered the patients improved if one of the aforementioned criteria was reached.
The collected data were analyzed statistically by SPSS 10 program and Student's t-test.

Results

The mean of age in the control group was 30.2 an in the cases group was 32.4. There was no significant difference in age between these 2 groups of patients (P>0.05).
In the control group 12(54%) out of 22 patients were male and 10 patients were female. In the cases group 11(50%) out of 22 patients were male and 11 patients were female. All of the patients completed the study and none of them reported any side effects.
In controls group, 4 patients out of 22(18.2%) had improvement in the pain period of their lesions and in the cases group 12 patients out of 22 (54.5%) had improvement. The mean of time to become pain free was 5.51.5 days and 4.091.3 days, for controls and cases patients respectively and this difference was significant (P value = 0.002) (table -1).
7 and 9 patients in the controls and case group had improvement in their healing time, respectively. The mean of healing time in the controls and cases group were 8.18 0.9 days and 8 1.19, respectively, and this difference was not significant statistically (P-value=0.57) (table 2).

Table 1: Comparison of the mean duration of pain in the cases and controls groups
(P value=0.002)
Group Mean duration of pain (days) Standard deviation
Controls groups 5.54 1.53
Cases group 4.09 1.34







Table 2: Comparison of the mean of healing time in the cases and controls groups
(P value=0.57)
Group Mean of healing time (days) Standard deviation
Controls groups 8.1 0/9
Cases group 8 1.19




Discussion

Recurrent Aphthous Ulceration (RAS) is a chromic and recurrent disorder and repetitive treatment courses are often necessary. Accordingly several types of treatment have been developed.

Treatment strategies for RAS most toke into account the possible immunopathogenesis and the benefit derived from and the potential adverse effects caused by treatment.

The treatment that are used currently for treatment of RAS are largely symptomatic and include treatments such as topical corticosteroids, chlorhexidine gluconate mouth rinse, benzydamine hydrochloride spray or moth rinse, prednisolone, levamisole, pentoxifylline, disodium cromoglycate, colchicine and thalidomide[14-18].

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of topical diclofenac in hyaluronan gel base for treatment of RAS. Our results showed that this treatment was effective in reducing pain duration of the lesions.

On the other hand, the healing period was less in the diclofenac treated group than placebo group although this difference was not significant.

We can conclude from our results that diclofenac gel is not effective in healing of the aphthous lesions although it is effective in reducing pain duration of the lesions. These effects may be related to anti inflammatory and pain reliving effects of the diclofenac in hyaluronan base.

In the literature review, only one study suggested the use of diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel for treatment of the RAS [13]. In this study, 60 healty adults were allocated in 3 groups and were treated with 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan, 2.5% hyaluronan and 3% viscous lidocaine. Their results showed a 35% to 52% pain reduction (P<0.01) in 6 hours after the application of diclofenac in hyaluronan, where as hyaluronan gel alone and viscous lidocaine failed to produce pain reductions. They concluded that 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan was an effective treatment for this common, painful disorder although they didn't evaluate the effect of this drug on the whole pain duration or healing time of the lesions.

With respect to results of our study and Saxes MA et al studies, we can conduce that 3% diclofenac in hyaluronan gel group is an effective therapy for treatment of the RAS.



References

1. Crispian Scully, Meir Gorsky, Francina Lozada-Nur. Aphthous Ulceration Dermatologic Therapy. Volume 15 Issue 3 Page 185, September 2002.

2. Miller MF, Ship II. A retrospective study of the prevalence and incidence of recurrent aphthous ulcers in a professional population, 1958 1971. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977: 43: 532 537.

3. Bagan JV, Sanchis JM, Milian MA, Penarrocha M, Silvestre FJ. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A study of the clinical characteristics of lesions in 93 cases. Oral Pathol Med 1991: 20: 395 397.

4. Crivelli MR, Aguas S, Adler I, Quarracino C, Bazergue P. Influence of socio-economic status on oral mucosa lesion prevalence in schoolchildren. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16: 58-60.

5. Rogers RS III. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: clinical characteristics and associated systemic disorders. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1997: 16: 278 283.

6. Meiller TF, Kutcher MJ, Overholser CD, Niehaus C. Effect of an antimicrobial mouthrinse on recurrent aphthous ulceration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991: 72: 425-429.

7. Porter SR, Hegarty A. Kaliakostov F et al. Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis. Clinical Dermatol 2000;18(5):569-578.

8. Ogura M, Yamamoto T, Morita M, Watanabe T. A case control study on food intake of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91 (1): 45-49.

9. Storck C. Aphthae of the oral cavity: differential diagnostic considerations concerning a case report. Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl 2000; 125: 127.

10. Riggio MP, Lennon A, Wray D. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in recurrent aphthous stomatitis tissue by PCR. J Oral Pathol Med 2000; 29 (10): 507-513.

11. Boulinguez S, Cornee-Leplat I, Bouyssou-Gauthier ML, et al. Analysis of the literature about drug-induced aphthous ulcers. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2000; 127 (2): 155-158.

12. Barnadas MA, Remacha A, Condomines J, de Moragas JM. Hematologic deficiencies in patients with recurrent oral aphthae. Med Clin (Barc) 1997; 109 (3): 85-87.

13. Saxen MA, Ambrosius WT, Rehemtula al-KF et al. Sustained relief of oral aphthous ulcer pain from topical diclofenac in hyaluronan: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Oct;84(4):356-61.

14. Barrons RW. Treatment strategies for recurrent oral aphthous ulcers. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58 (1): 41-50.

15. Popovsky JL, Camisa C. New and emerging therapies for diseases of the oral cavity. Dermatol Clin 2000; 18: 113-125.

16. Lacosta Nicolas JL, Martinez Iniguez JC. Treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. A bibliographic review. Rev Clin Esp 1998; (4): 234-236.

17. Woo SB, Sonis ST. Recurrent aphthous ulcers: a review of diagnosis and treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127 (8): 1202-1213.

18. Hunter L, Addy M. Chlorhexidine glucunate mouthwash in the management of minor aphthous ulceration. A double-blind placebo controlled cross-over trial. Br Debt J 1987; 162: 106-10.



 

2004 Egyptian Dermatology Online Journal